Why the Ultra-Darwinists and the Creationists Both Get It Wrong by Conor Cunningham [Book Review]

The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 15 (3):605-607 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

ISBN(s)

15325490

DOI

10.5840/ncbq201515359

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Conor Cunningham. Darwin's Pious Idea: Why the Ultra-Darwinists and Creationists Both Get It Wrong. xx + 543 pp., illus., index. Grand Rapids, Mich./Cambridge: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2011. $34. [REVIEW]Frederick Gregory - 2012 - Isis 103 (2):429-431.
Darwin’s Pious Idea. Why the Ultra-Darwinists and Creationists Both Get It Wrong. [REVIEW]Alessandra Gerolin - 2011 - Philosophical News 3.
Darwin's Pious Idea: Why the Ultra-Darwinists and Creationists Both Get It Wrong. [REVIEW]Frederick Gregory - 2012 - Isis 103:429-431.
Differences in epistemic practices among scientists, young earth creationists, intelligent design creationists, and the scientist-creationists of Darwin's era.Clark A. Chinn & Luke A. Buckland - 2011 - In Roger S. Taylor & Michel Ferrari (eds.), Epistemology and Science Education: Understanding the Evolution Vs. Routledge. pp. 38--76.
Belief and Metaphysics.Conor Cunningham & Peter M. Candler (eds.) - 2007 - SCM Press.
The Grandeur of Reason.Conor Cunningham & Peter M. Candler (eds.) - 2010 - SCM Press.
The end of death?Conor Cunningham - 2005 - Yearbook of the Irish Philosophical Society:19-42.
Thomas Nagel. Mind and Cosmos: Why the Materialist and Neo-Darwinian Conception of Nature is Almost Certainly False.Conor Cunningham - 2014 - Philosophy, Theology and the Sciences 1 (1):130.
The Difference Of Theology and Some Philosophies of Nothing.Conor Cunningham - 2001 - Modern Theology 17 (3):289-312.
Nihilism and theology: who stands at the door?Conor Cunningham - 2013 - In Nicholas Adams, George Pattison & Graham Ward (eds.), The Oxford handbook of theology and modern European thought. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. pp. 325.
A Guide to the Phenomenology of Religion: Key Figures, Formative Influences and Subsequent Debates. By James L. Cox and Transcendence and Phenomenology. Edited by Peter M. Candler, Jr. and Conor Cunningham. [REVIEW]Vincent Lloyd - 2010 - Heythrop Journal 51 (3):516-518.
A Guide to the Phenomenology of Religion: Key Figures, Formative Influences and Subsequent Debates. By James L. Cox and Transcendence and Phenomenology. Edited by Peter M. Candler, Jr. and Conor Cunningham. [REVIEW]Vincent Lloyd - 2009 - Heythrop Journal 50 (3):558-559.
Probability and Evolution. Why the Probability Argument of Creationists is Wrong.Josef Schurz - 2007 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 38 (1):163-165.
Locating the wrongness in ultra-violent video games.David I. Waddington - 2007 - Ethics and Information Technology 9 (2):121-128.
Plus ultra, non plus ultra, and the columnar device of emperor Charles V.Earl Rosenthal - 1971 - Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 34 (1):204-228.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-30

Downloads
19 (#753,814)

6 months
1 (#1,459,555)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Brendan Sweetman
Rockhurst University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references