Why Indirect Harms do not Support Social Robot Rights

Minds and Machines 32 (4):735-749 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

There is growing evidence to support the claim that we react differently to robots than we do to other objects. In particular, we react differently to robots with which we have some form of social interaction. In this paper I critically assess the claim that, due to our tendency to become emotionally attached to social robots, permitting their harm may be damaging for society and as such we should consider introducing legislation to grant social robots rights and protect them from harm. I conclude that there is little evidence to support this claim and that legislation in this area would restrict progress in areas of social care where social robots are a potentially valuable resource.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,363

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Common Humanity and Human Rights.Jeremy Bendik-Keymer - 2005 - Social Philosophy Today 21:51-62.
Common Humanity and Human Rights.Jeremy Bendik-Keymer - 2005 - Social Philosophy Today 21:51-62.
“Group Rights” and Racial Affirmative Action.Kwame Anthony Appiah - 2011 - The Journal of Ethics 15 (3):265-280.
When is a robot a moral agent.John P. Sullins - 2006 - International Review of Information Ethics 6 (12):23-30.
You and I, robot.Shaun Gallagher - 2013 - AI and Society 28 (4):455-460.
Animal Rights and Human Social Issues.David A. Nibert - 1994 - Society and Animals 2 (2):115-124.
Acknowledging Animal Rights: A Thomistic Perspective.Paul A. Macdonald - 2021 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 95 (1):95-116.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-03-08

Downloads
5 (#1,170,023)

6 months
1 (#451,398)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Paula Sweeney
University of Aberdeen

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Welcoming Robots into the Moral Circle: A Defence of Ethical Behaviourism.John Danaher - 2020 - Science and Engineering Ethics 26 (4):2023-2049.
An enquiry concerning human understanding.David Hume - 1955 - In Steven M. Cahn (ed.), Exploring Philosophy: An Introductory Anthology. Oxford University Press. pp. 112.
The other question: can and should robots have rights?David J. Gunkel - 2018 - Ethics and Information Technology 20 (2):87-99.

View all 13 references / Add more references