The Seeds of Violence: Ecofeminism, Technology, and Ecofeminist Philosophy of Technology

In Janina Loh & Mark Coeckelbergh (ed.), Feminist Philosophy of Technology (Volume 2 - Techno:Phil - Aktuelle Herausforderungen der Technikphilosophie). pp. 247-264 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Ecofeminist philosophy is a development of feminist philosophy that addresses the intersection of sexism and environmental issues. Coined by Francoise d’Eaubonne, the term “ecofeminism” refers to a diverse collection of feminist thought that shares the conviction that the present environmental crisis is due not solely to the anthropomorphic nature of dominant conceptualisations of human-nature relations, with their emphasis on notion of mastery and control, but also to their androcentric nature. Technology features frequently in ecofeminist writings, in analyses of technocracy (Birkeland 1993), Nuclear Power (Caputi 1993), reproductive technologies (Diamond 1990), or the production of computer interfaces (Romberger 2011), to give but a few examples. Despite being a recurrent theme, technology itself as a phenomenon is rarely directly considered. For many ecofeminists technology seems to operate as an umbrella term for a collection of artefacts whose positive or negative characteristics are ultimately contingent upon the manner in which they are employed. The individual technologies appear as value neutral. There are of course exceptions to this piecemeal approach to technological artefacts, and in this chapter I shall focus upon two ecofeminist philosophers whose consideration of technology moves from the individual instance towards a more general account of the nature of technology. The first, Karen Warren, gives technology a central place in her philosophical analysis. However, I shall suggest, her commitment to an instrumental understanding of technology renders her approach problematic. I will then consider the work of Vandana Shiva. Standard analyses of Shiva’s work tend to overlook the philosophical dimensions of her thought, in particular the continuous emphasis on science and technology. I argue that Shiva puts forward a sophisticated technological determinist philosophy of that emphasises the role of political and patriarchal interests in technological development and subsequent social and environmental interventions.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ecological Feminism as Environmental Ethics.Christine June Cuomo - 1992 - Dissertation, The University of Wisconsin - Madison
Unravelling the Problems in Ecofeminism.Christine J. Cuomo - 1992 - Environmental Ethics 14 (4):351-363.
Unravelling the problems in ecofeminism.Christine J. Cuomo - 1992 - Environmental Ethics 14 (4):351-363.
The Philosophical Colonization of Ecofeminism.Julie Cook - 1998 - Environmental Ethics 20 (3):227-246.
The philosophical colonization of ecofeminism.Julie Cook - 1998 - Environmental Ethics 20 (3):227-246.
Beasts of Burden: Women, Animals, and Oppression.Amy Lee Goff-Yates - 1999 - Dissertation, University of Kentucky
The universal versus the particular in ecofeminist ethics.Grace Y. Kao - 2010 - Journal of Religious Ethics 38 (4):616-637.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-02-22

Downloads
276 (#70,459)

6 months
256 (#8,584)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Gregory Morgan Swer
University of KwaZulu-Natal

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references