Princeton University Press (2012)
AbstractHow the insane asylum became a laboratory of democracy is revealed in this provocative look at the treatment of the mentally ill in nineteenth-century France. Political thinkers reasoned that if government was to rest in the hands of individuals, then measures should be taken to understand the deepest reaches of the self, including the state of madness. Marcel Gauchet and Gladys Swain maintain that the asylum originally embodied the revolutionary hope of curing all the insane by saving the glimmer of sanity left in them. Their analysis of why this utopian vision failed ultimately constitutes both a powerful argument for liberalism and a direct challenge to Michel Foucault's indictment of liberal institutions. The creation of an artificial environment was meant to encourage the mentally ill to live as social beings, in conditions that resembled as much as possible those prevailing in real life. The asylum was therefore the first instance of a modern utopian community in which a scientifically designed environment was supposed to achieve complete control over the minds of a whole category of human beings. Gauchet and Swain argue that the social domination of the inner self, far from being the hidden truth of emancipation, represented the failure of its overly optimistic beginnings. Madness and Democracy combines rich details of nineteenth-century asylum life with reflections on the crucial role of subjectivity and difference within modernism. Its final achievement is to show that the lessons learned from the failure of the asylum led to the rise of psychoanalysis, an endeavor focused on individual care and on the cooperation between psychiatrist and patient. By linking the rise of liberalism to a chapter in the history of psychiatry, Gauchet and Swain offer a fascinating reassessment of political modernity.
9781400822874 0691033722 1400822874
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
9781400822874 0691033722 1400822874
References found in this work
No references found.
Citations of this work
What Can Social Psychologists Learn From Architecture? The Asylum as Example.Juliet L. H. Foster - 2014 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 44 (2):131-147.
Enchanting Social Democracy: The Resilience of a Belief System.François Godard - 2011 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 23 (4):475-494.
Similar books and articles
Book Review of'Madness and Democracy: The Modern Psychiatric Universe' by Marcel Gauchet and Gladys Swain. [REVIEW]LeeAnn Hansen - 2004 - Annals of Science 61 (3):1-1.
Revising Foucault's Model of Modernity and Exclusion: Gauchet and Swain On Madness and Democracy.Wim Weymans - 2009 - Thesis Eleven 98 (1):33-51.
What Sujet de la Folie? Gladys Swain and Marcel Gauchet’s Search for an Alternative History of Madness.Bettina Bergo - 2010 - PhaenEx 5 (2):87-124.
Psychiatric Power: Lectures at the Collège De France, 1973-74.Michel Foucault - 2006 - Palgrave-Macmillan.
Psychiatric Diagnosis, Psychiatric Power and Psychiatric Abuse.T. Szasz - 1994 - Journal of Medical Ethics 20 (3):135-138.
Reviving the Past for the Future?: The (In)Compatibility Between Confucianism and Democracy in Contemporary China.Demin Duan - 2014 - Asian Philosophy 24 (2):147-157.
The Politics of Psychiatric Drug Treatment.J. Moncrieff - 2006 - In D. B. Double (ed.), Critical Psychiatry: The Limits of Madness. Palgrave-Macmillan.
“A Hideous Torture on Himself”: Madness and Self-Mutilation in Victorian Literature. [REVIEW]Sarah Chaney - 2011 - Journal of Medical Humanities 32 (4):279-289.
Classifying Madness: A Philosophical Examination of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders.Rachel Cooper - 2005 - Springer.
A Madness for Identity: Psychiatric Labels, Consumer Autonomy, and the Perils of the Internet.Louis C. Charland - 2004 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 11 (4):335-349.
Female Sexuality and Madness in Russian Culture: Traditional Values and Psychiatric Theory.Julie Brown - 1986 - Social Research: An International Quarterly 53.