Engaging the normative question in the H5N1 avian influenza mutation experiments

Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 8:12 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In recent time there has been ample discussion concerning censorship of research conducted in two labs involved in avian influenza virus research. Much of the debate has centered on the question whether the methods and results should reach to open disclosure given the “dual use” nature of this research which can be used for nefarious purposes

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Risk to Human Health Posed by Avian Influenza.Anne Moates - 2005 - Chisholm Health Ethics Bulletin 11 (2):1.
Ethical Issues in the Management of Bird Flu Pandemic.Norman Ford - 2005 - Chisholm Health Ethics Bulletin 11 (2):4.
Nuovi studi aristotelici.Enrico Berti - 2004 - Brescia: Morcelliana.
Against Normative Naturalism.Matthew S. Bedke - 2012 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90 (1):111 - 129.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-09-07

Downloads
70 (#229,722)

6 months
10 (#255,509)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Gain-of-Function Research: Ethical Analysis.Michael J. Selgelid - 2016 - Science and Engineering Ethics 22 (4):923-964.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Reasons and Persons.Derek Parfit - 1984 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
Reasons and Persons.Joseph Margolis - 1986 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 47 (2):311-327.
Future contingents and relative truth.John MacFarlane - 2003 - Philosophical Quarterly 53 (212):321–336.

View all 6 references / Add more references