Ethics, Policy and Environment 18 (1):103-105 (2015)

Toby Svoboda
Fairfield University
We thank the commentators for their interesting and helpful feedback on our previously published target article (Svoboda and Irvine, 2014). One of our objectives in that article was to identify areas of uncertainty that would need to be addressed in crafting a just SRM compensation system. The commentators have indicated some possible ways of reducing such uncertainty. Although we cannot respond to all their points due to limitations of space, we wish to address here the more pressing criticisms the commentators have offered.
Keywords geoengineering  climate change  compensation
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/21550085.2015.1021948
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Solar Geoengineering: Reassessing Costs, Benefits, and Compensation.Joshua Horton - 2014 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 17 (2):175-177.
Response to Svoboda and Irvine.Jesse Reynolds - 2014 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 17 (2):183-185.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Precaution and Solar Radiation Management.Lauren Hartzell-Nichols - 2012 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 15 (2):158 - 171.
Will Geoengineering With Solar Radiation Management Ever Be Used?Alan Robock - 2012 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 15 (2):202 - 205.


Added to PP index

Total views
93 ( #125,657 of 2,507,562 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
12 ( #63,627 of 2,507,562 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes