Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 19 (4):973-984 (2016)
AbstractMark Rowlands defends a Rawlsian argument for animal rights, according to which animals have rights because we would assign them rights when deciding on the principles of morality from behind a veil of ignorance. Rowlands’s argument depends on a non-standard interpretation of the veil of ignorance, according to which we cannot know whether we are human or non-human on the other side of the veil. Rowlands claims that his interpretation of the veil is more consistent with a core commitment of Rawlsian justice—the intuitive equality principle—than either Rawls or his critics realize. Here I argue that Rawls is not committed to the intuitive equality principle, as Rowlands articulates it, and hence Rowlands’s argument is in fact only superficially Rawlsian. Furthermore, Rowlands’s intuitive equality principle is dubious on its own terms, and thus a poor principle on which to base a case for animal rights.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
Citations of this work
¿Caben los animales en la filosofía política de John Rawls?Pablo Magaña - 2022 - Isonomía. Revista de Teoría y Filosofía Del Derecho 56.
Similar books and articles
A Rawlsian Pro-Life Argument Against Vegetarianism.John Zeis - 2013 - International Philosophical Quarterly 53 (1):63-71.
Animal Century: A Celebration of Changing Attitudes to Animals.Mark Gold - 1998 - J. Carpenter.
People Promoting and People Opposing Animal Rights: In Their Own Words.John M. Kistler - 2002 - Greenwood Press.
The Philosophy Behind the Movement: Animal Studies Vs. Animal Rights.Elisa Aaltola - 2011 - Society and Animals 19 (4):393-406.
The Five Freedoms of Animal Welfare Are Rights.Clare McCausland - 2014 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 27 (4):649-662.
Animal Rights: Autonomy and Redundancy. [REVIEW]David Sztybel - 2001 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 14 (3):259-273.
Agricultural Technology, Wealth, and Responsibility.Gene Wunderlich - 1990 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 3 (1):21-35.
Your Daughter or Your Dog? A Feminist Assessment of the Animal Research Issue.Deborah Slicer - 1991 - Hypatia 6 (1):108-124.