The false promises of risk analysis

Ratio 6 (1):16-26 (1993)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The relatively new discipline of risk analysis promises to provide objective guidance in some of the most controversial issues in modern high‐technology societies. Four conditions are discussed that must be satisfied for this promise to be fulfilled. Since none of these conditions is satisfied, risk analysis does not keep its promise. In its attempts to reduce genuinely political issues to technocratic calculations, it neglects many of the factors that should influence decisions on risk acceptance. A list of tentative guidelines is given for numerical decision support that encourages democratic decision‐making instead of trying to evade it.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,139

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
57 (#264,838)

6 months
8 (#241,888)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Sven Ove Hansson
Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm

Citations of this work

Ethical criteria of risk acceptance.Sven Ove Hansson - 2003 - Erkenntnis 59 (3):291 - 309.
Weighing Risks and Benefits.Sven Ove Hansson - 2004 - Topoi 23 (2):145-152.
Hypothetical Retrospection.Sven Ove Hansson - 2007 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 10 (2):145-157.

View all 17 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

The Indeterminacy of Options.Joseph Mendola - 1987 - American Philosophical Quarterly 24 (2):125 - 136.
Non-backtracking Counterfactuals and the Conditional Analysis.Mark Heller - 1985 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 15 (1):75-85.

Add more references