Do the bell inequalities require the existence of joint probability distributions?

Philosophy of Science 55 (3):387-401 (1988)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Fine has recently proved the surprising result that satisfaction of the Bell inequality in a Clauser-Horne experiment implies the existence of joint probabilities for pairs of noncommuting observables in the experiment. In this paper we show that if probabilities are interpreted in the von Mises-Church sense of relative frequencies on random sequences, a proof of the Bell inequality is nonetheless possible in which such joint probabilities are assumed not to exist. We also argue that Fine's theorem and related results do not impugn the common view that local realists are committed to the Bell inequality

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
84 (#193,846)

6 months
10 (#219,185)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Michael Redhead
Last affiliation: London School of Economics
Harvey Brown
Oxford University
Jeremy Butterfield
Cambridge University

References found in this work

Incompleteness, non locality and realism. A prolegomenon to the philosophy of quantum mechanics.Michael Redhead - 1987 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 180 (4):712-713.
Probability and the interpretation of quantum mechanics.Arthur Fine - 1973 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 24 (1):1-37.
Contextual hidden variables theories and Bell’s inequalities.Abner Shimony - 1984 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 35 (1):25-45.
On the completeness of quantum theory.Arthur Fine - 1974 - Synthese 29 (1-4):257 - 289.

View all 8 references / Add more references