Smarter regulations

Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (3):303-309 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In the United States a rapidly increasing regulatory burden for life scientists has led to questions of whether the increased burden resulting from the Select Agent Program has had adverse effects on scientific advances. Attention has focussed on the regulatory “fit” of the Program and ways in which its design could be improved. An international framework convention to address common concerns about biosecurity and biosafety is a logical next step.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-07-13

Downloads
27 (#572,408)

6 months
4 (#818,853)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Dual-use decision making: relational and positional issues.Nicholas G. Evans - 2014 - Monash Bioethics Review 32 (3-4):268-283.
The Streetlight Effect: Regulating Genomics Where the Light Is.Barbara J. Evans - 2020 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 48 (1):105-118.
Editors' Overview: Forbidding Science? [REVIEW]Gary E. Marchant & Stephanie J. Bird - 2009 - Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (3):263-269.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Responsible conduct by life scientists in an age of terrorism.Ronald M. Atlas - 2009 - Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (3):293-301.
A Multidisciplinary Approach to an Ethic of Biodefense and Bioterrorism.Victoria Sutton - 2005 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 33 (2):310-322.
A Multidisciplinary Approach to an Ethic of Biodefense and Bioterrorism.Victoria Sutton - 2005 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 33 (2):310-322.

Add more references