Information Privacy and Social Self-Authorship

Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 20 (3):216-239 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The dominant approach in privacy theory defines information privacy as some form of control over personal information. In this essay, I argue that the control approach is mistaken, but for different reasons than those offered by its other critics. I claim that information privacy involves the drawing of epistemic boundaries—boundaries between what others should and shouldn’t know about us. While controlling what information others have about us is one strategy we use to draw such boundaries, it is not the only one. We conceal information about ourselves and we reveal it. And since the meaning of information is not self-evident, we also work to shape how others contextualize and interpret the information about us that they have. Information privacy is thus about more than controlling information; it involves the constant work of producing and managing public identities, what I call “social self- authorship.” In the second part of the essay, I argue that thinking about information privacy in terms of social self- authorship helps us see ways that information technology threatens privacy, which the control approach misses. Namely, information technology makes social self- authorship invisible and unnecessary, by making it difficult for us to know when others are forming impressions about us, and by providing them with tools for making assumptions about who we are which obviate the need for our involvement in the process.

Similar books and articles

The importance of privacy revisited.Norman Mooradian - 2009 - Ethics and Information Technology 11 (3):163-174.
Four challenges for a theory of informational privacy.Luciano Floridi - 2006 - Ethics and Information Technology 8 (3):109–119.
Privacy and discrete "social spheres".Jonathan Schonscheck - 1997 - Ethics and Behavior 7 (3):221 – 228.
Search engines, personal information and the problem of privacy in public.Herman T. Tavani - 2005 - International Review of Information Ethics 3:39-45.
The ontological interpretation of informational privacy.Luciano Floridi - 2005 - Ethics and Information Technology 7 (4):185–200.
Privacy as a Matter of Taste and Right.Alexander Rosenberg - 2000 - Social Philosophy and Policy 17 (2):68.
Privacy as Informational Commodity.Jarek Gryz - 2013 - Proceedings of IACAP Conference.
Privacy and policy for genetic research.Judith Wagner DeCew - 2004 - Ethics and Information Technology 6 (1):5-14.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-12-22

Downloads
727 (#19,993)

6 months
112 (#28,955)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Daniel Susser
Cornell University

Citations of this work

From privacy to anti-discrimination in times of machine learning.Thilo Hagendorff - 2019 - Ethics and Information Technology 21 (4):331-343.
Decision Time: Normative Dimensions of Algorithmic Speed.Daniel Susser - forthcoming - ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT '22).

Add more citations