“Do you understand these charges?”: How procedural communication in youth criminal justice court violates the rights of young offenders in Canada

Semiotica 2019 (229):173-191 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper considers Canada’s young offenders in the context from which they enter the youth criminal courtroom. To determine how youth criminal justice courts violate the Canadian Youth Criminal Justice Act, this analysis relates said context to several phenomena, including legal linguistics, oral language competency, literacy, communicative competency, non-verbal communication, the physical structure of youth courtrooms, and legal translation. As a result of the standards of procedural communication upheld by the Canadian criminal justice system, young people’s rights, including the right to be respected regardless of cultural, ethnic, or linguistic differences, the right to be heard and to participate in proceedings, the right to be sentenced meaningfully, the right to privacy, and the right to be tried in a timely manner are abused in the youth criminal courtroom. Although insufficient structures of procedural communication cause these issues and are beyond the control of counsel, defense counsel are often blamed for their effects. Legal professionals must make important adjustments such as altering the formal speech required in youth criminal courtrooms, employing legal professionals with the role of translating legal jargon to young people in the courtroom, and closing youth courtrooms off from the public to reduce the YCJA violations occurring in youth criminal justice court. These adjustments are ultimately the responsibility of the Canadian criminal justice system.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Revenge, Victim’s Rights, and Criminal Justice.Michael Davis - 2000 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 14 (1):119-128.
Fair Trials and Procedural Tradition in Europe.Stewart Field - 2009 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 29 (2):365-387.
Habeas Corpus as Jus Cogens in International Law.Larry May - 2010 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 4 (3):249-265.
A Victim's Right to Access Justice (text only in Lithuanian).Rima Ažubalytė - 2010 - Jurisprudencija: Mokslo darbu žurnalas 122 (4):221-244.
jasper's Kangaroo Court Of International Injustice: A Response.Eric Smaw - 2003 - Florida Philosophical Review 3 (2):45-61.
Consumer Rights: An Assessment of Justice. [REVIEW]Gretchen Larsen & Rob Lawson - 2013 - Journal of Business Ethics 112 (3):515-528.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-04-13

Downloads
22 (#690,757)

6 months
5 (#629,136)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references