The structure of a scientific paper. Commentary. Authors' reply

Philosophy of Science 65 (3):381-424 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Scientific articles exemplify standard functional units constraining argumentative structures. Severe space limitations demand every paragraph and illustration contribute to establishing the paper's claims. Philosophical testing and confirmation models should take into account each paragraph, table, and illustration. Hypothetico-Deductive, Bayesian Inductive, and Inference-to-the-Best-Explanation models do not, garbling the logic of papers. Micro-analysis of the fundamental paper in plate tectonics reveals an argumentative structure commonplace in science but ignored by standard philosophical accounts that cannot be dismissed as mere rhetorical embellishment. Papers with illustrations often display a second argumentative structure differing from the text's. Constraints on adequate testing and confirmation analyses are adduced. “Experiments are about the assembly of persuasive arguments, ones that will stand up in court. … The task at hand is to capture the building-up of a persuasive argument about the world even in the absence of the logician's certainty.”—Galison, How Experiments End, 277.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Scientific papers have various structures.Valerie Gray Hardcastle - 1999 - Philosophy of Science 66 (3):415-439.
The Structure of scientific theories.Frederick Suppe (ed.) - 1974 - Urbana,: University of Illinois Press.
The structure of a scientific paper.Frederick Suppe - 1998 - Philosophy of Science 65 (3):381-405.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-23

Downloads
3 (#1,519,925)

6 months
1 (#1,040,386)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Colin Howson
Last affiliation: London School of Economics

Citations of this work

Digital Literature Analysis for Empirical Philosophy of Science.Oliver M. Lean, Luca Rivelli & Charles H. Pence - 2021 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science (4):875-898.
Predictivism for pluralists.Eric Christian Barnes - 2005 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56 (3):421-450.
Science, Biases, and the Threat of Global Pessimism.K. Brad Wray - 2001 - Philosophy of Science 68 (S3):S467-S478.
Science, biases, and the threat of global pessimism.K. Brad Wray - 2001 - Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association 2001 (3):S467-.
Reply to commentators.Frederick Suppe - 1998 - Philosophy of Science 65 (3):417-424.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references