Pre-Aristotelian Theories of Argument: Isocratean Vocabulary and Practice

Abstract

This essay contributes to our understanding of pre-Aristotelian concepts of argument by examining the works of the Attic rhetorician Isocrates. Isocrates employed a quasi-technical vocabulary and described conditions under which various types of arguments more or less proper. By careful abstraction we can see what he meant by these terms and conditions. Though not an original argument theorist, per se, Isocrates provides us with a window into pre-Aristotelian argumentation.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Isocrates's Paideia and the Poetics of Character.Thomas W. Foster - 1999 - Dissertation, University of Kansas
The Role of Personality in Argument Evaluation.Brenda Oyer, Mark Gillespie, Mohammed Issah & Daniel Fasko - 2012 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 27 (2):40-49.
A defense of war and sport metaphors in argument.Scott Aikin - 2011 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 44 (3):250-272.
Toward the Rebirth of Aristotelian Psychology : Trendelenburg and Brentano.Edoardo Fugali - 2009 - Studies in the History of Philosophy of Mind 8:179-202.
Impossible Obligations are not Necessarily Deliberatively Pointless.Christopher Jay - 2013 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 113 (3pt3):381-389.
Actors Are Not Like Zombies.E. Diaz-Leon - 2012 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 112 (1pt1):115-122.
An Aristotelian View of Theory and Practice in Business Ethics.Sherwin Klein - 1998 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 12 (2):203-222.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-04-02

Downloads
7 (#1,316,802)

6 months
1 (#1,459,555)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The sophistic movement.G. B. Kerferd - 1981 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Polarity and Analogy.D. W. Hamlyn & G. E. R. Lloyd - 1968 - Philosophical Review 77 (2):242.
Polarity and Analogy, Two types of argumentation in early Greek thought.G. E. R. Lloyd - 1969 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 159:275-278.

View all 9 references / Add more references