Long-Term Potentiation: One Kind or Many?

In Marcus P. Adams, Zvi Biener, Uljana Feest & Jacqueline Anne Sullivan (eds.), Eppur Si Muove: Doing History and Philosophy of Science with Peter Machamer: A Collection of Essays in Honor of Peter Machamer. Dordrecht: Springer. pp. 127-140 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Do neurobiologists aim to discover natural kinds? I address this question in this chapter via a critical analysis of classification practices operative across the 43-year history of research on long-term potentiation (LTP). I argue that this 43-year history supports the idea that the structure of scientific practice surrounding LTP research has remained an obstacle to the discovery of natural kinds.

Similar books and articles

Naming natural kinds.Åsa Maria Wikforss - 2005 - Synthese 145 (1):65-87.
Beyond reduction: mechanisms, multifield integration and the unity of neuroscience.Carl F. Craver - 2005 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 36 (2):373-395.
Is memory a natural kind?Kourken Michaelian - 2011 - Memory Studies 4 (2):170-189.
Natural Kinds and Manifest Forms of Life.J. Brakel - 1992 - Dialectica 46 (3‐4):243-261.
Repetition priming: Memory or attention?Peter M. Milner - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (4):623-623.
Natural Kinds.T. E. Wilkerson - 1988 - Philosophy 63 (243):29-42.
Chronic pain explained.Kenneth Sufka - 2000 - Brain and Mind 1 (2):155-179.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-05-08

Downloads
398 (#47,445)

6 months
72 (#58,472)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jacqueline Anne Sullivan
University of Western Ontario

Citations of this work

Recharacterizing scientific phenomena.David Colaço - 2020 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 10 (2):1-19.

Add more citations