Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 16 (4):305-331 (2006)

Authors
Daniel Sulmasy
Georgetown University
Abstract
: On the grounds that rape is an act of violence, not a natural act of intercourse, Roman Catholic teaching traditionally has permitted women who have been raped to take steps to prevent pregnancy, while consistently prohibiting abortion even in the case of rape. Recent scientific evidence that emergency contraception (EC) works primarily by preventing ovulation, not by preventing implantation or by aborting implanted embryos, has led Church authorities to permit the use of EC drugs in the setting of rape. Doubts about whether an abortifacient effect of EC drugs has been completely disproven have led to controversy within the Church about whether it is sufficient to determine that a woman is not pregnant before using EC drugs or whether one must establish that she has not recently ovulated. This article presents clinical, epidemiological, and ethical arguments why testing for pregnancy should be morally sufficient for a faith community that is strongly opposed to abortion.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1353/ken.2006.0026
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,410
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Conscientious Objection and Person-Centered Care.Stephen Buetow & Natalie Gauld - 2018 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 39 (2):143-155.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
135 ( #87,810 of 2,519,842 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #205,232 of 2,519,842 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes