Clinical Ethics 13 (2):88-97 (2018)
Abstract |
Harm minimisation has been proposed as a means of supporting people who self-injure. When adopting this approach, rather than trying to stop self-injury immediately the person is allowed to injure safely whilst developing more appropriate ways of dealing with distress. The approach is controversial as the health care professional actively allows harm to occur. This paper will consider a specific objection to harm minimisation. That is, it is a misguided collaboration between the health care professional and the person who self-injures that is morally and clinically questionable. The objection has two components. The first component is moral in nature and asserts that the health care professional is complicit in any harm that occurs and as a result they can be held morally responsible and subject to moral blame. The second component is clinical in nature and suggests that harm minimisation involves the health care professional in colluding in the perpetuation of self-injury. This element of the objection i...
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
ISBN(s) | |
DOI | 10.1177/1477750917749953 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Relational Autonomy: Feminist Perspectives on Autonomy, Agency, and the Social Self.Catriona Mackenzie & Natalie Stoljar (eds.) - 2000 - Oxford University Press.
Hiding From Humanity: Disgust, Shame, and the Law.Martha C. Nussbaum - 2004 - Princeton University Press.
Can We Harm and Benefit in Creating?Elizabeth Harman - 2004 - Philosophical Perspectives 18 (1):89–113.
View all 10 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Safer Self-Injury or Assisted Self-Harm?Kerry Gutridge - 2010 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 31 (1):79-92.
The Moral Status of Enabling Harm.Samuel C. Rickless - 2011 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 92 (1):66-86.
The Evil of Refraining to Save: Liu on the Doctrine of Doing and Allowing.Jacob Blair - 2017 - Diametros 52:127-137.
The Doctrine of Doing and Allowing I: Analysis of the Doing/Allowing Distinction.Fiona Woollard - 2012 - Philosophy Compass 7 (7):448-458.
Doing, Allowing, and Enabling Harm: An Empirical Investigation.Christian Barry, Matthew Lindauer & Gerhard Øverland - 2014 - In Joshua Knobe, Tania Lombrozo & Shaun Nichols (eds.), Oxford Studies in Experimental Philosophy, Volume 1. Oxford University Press.
The Doctrine of Doing and Allowing II: The Moral Relevance of the Doing/Allowing Distinction.Fiona Woollard - 2012 - Philosophy Compass 7 (7):459-469.
Doing Harm, Allowing Harm, and Denying Resources.Timothy Hall - 2008 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 5 (1):50-76.
Balancing Costs and Benefits: A Clinical Perspective Does Not Support a Harm Minimisation Approach for Self-Injury Outside of Community Settings.Hanna Pickard & Steve Pearce - 2017 - Journal of Medical Ethics 43 (5):324-326.
Are Enabling and Allowing Harm Morally Equivalent?Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen - 2015 - Utilitas 27 (3):365-383.
Enabling Harm, Doing Harm, and Undoing One’s Own Behavior.Jason Hanna - 2015 - Ethics 126 (1):68-90.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2018-01-11
Total views
19 ( #579,424 of 2,499,033 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #278,516 of 2,499,033 )
2018-01-11
Total views
19 ( #579,424 of 2,499,033 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #278,516 of 2,499,033 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads