Aristotle on the Function of Man: Fallacies, Heresies and Other Entertainments

Canadian Journal of Philosophy 4 (1):23 - 40 (1974)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It has long been believed that if man had a special function appropriate to him, and that if we could discover what it was, then we would be in a perfect position to solve all of the basic problems of ethics. For if we were, for example, shovels, and knew ourselves to be shovels, then we would also know that to spend our lives in digging would best serve our fundamental interests, realize our highest aspirations, and be in every respect the correct thing to do. Or so the theory goes; a theory which is shared, interestingly enough, by Aristotle and Sartre, even though they share little else, and even though one of them believes that man has a function and the other does not.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What is a Sophistical Refutation?David Botting - 2012 - Argumentation 26 (2):213-232.
Fallacies of Accident.David Botting - 2012 - Argumentation 26 (2):267-289.
The Latin “Third Man”. A Survey and Edition of Texts from the XIIIth Century.Leone Gazziero - 2012 - Cahiers de L’Institut du Moyen Age Grec Et Latin 81:11-93.
Aristotle's Argument for a Human Function.Rachel Barney - 2008 - Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 34:293-322.
Fallacies and formal logic in Aristotle.David Hitchcock - 2000 - History and Philosophy of Logic 21 (3):207-221.
Aristotle on the Function of Man in Relation to Eudaimonia.Marcus Hester - 1991 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 8 (1):3 - 14.
Three fallacies.Jonathan E. Adler - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):665-666.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
79 (#203,897)

6 months
12 (#178,599)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?