Explaining human cognitive autapomorphies

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (2):147-148 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The real reason for the apparent discontinuity between human and nonhuman minds is that all closely related hominids have become extinct. Nonetheless, I agree with Penn et al. that comparative psychology should aim to establish what cognitive traits humans share with other animals and what traits they do not share, because this could make profound contributions to genetics and neuroscience. There is, however, no consensus yet, and Penn et al.'s conclusion that it all comes down to one trait is premature

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,164

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Language as a cognitive tool.Marco Mirolli & Domenico Parisi - 2009 - Minds and Machines 19 (4):517-528.
Cognitive Models in the Philosophy of Science.Ronald N. Giere - 1986 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1986:319 - 328.
Sub-phenomenology.David A. Jopling - 1996 - Human Studies 19 (2):153-73.
Models of cognition: Neurological possibility does not indicate neurological plausibility.Peter R. Krebs - 2005 - In Proceedings of CogSci 2005. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. pp. 184-1189.
Aquinas, Cognitive Theory, and Analogy.John P. O’Callaghan - 2002 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 76 (3):451-482.
Let the brain explain the mind: The case of attention.Maria Ruz - 2006 - Philosophical Psychology 19 (4):495-505.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
49 (#308,026)

6 months
6 (#403,662)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?