Bi-Level Evidentialism and Reformed Apologetics

Faith and Philosophy 11 (3):379-396 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,102

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Reformed epistemology and Christian apologetics.Michael Sudduth - 2003 - Religious Studies 39 (3):299-321.
Alstonian foundationalism and higher-level theistic evidentialism.Michael L. Czapkay Sudduth - 1995 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 37 (1):25-44.
Revisiting the ‘Reformed Objection’ to Natural Theology.Michael Sudduth - 2009 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 1 (2):37-62.
Evidentialism and the Great Pumpkin objection.Michael Bergmann - 2011 - In Trent Dougherty (ed.), Evidentialism and its Discontents. Oxford University Press. pp. 123.
Modest Evidentialism.Scott F. Aikin - 2006 - International Philosophical Quarterly 46 (3):327-343.
Evidentialism.Daniel M. Mittag - 2004 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Evidentialism and the paradox of parity.Keith Lehrer - 2011 - In Trent Dougherty (ed.), Evidentialism and its Discontents. Oxford University Press.
Evidentialism, internalism, disjunctivism.Duncan Pritchard - 2011 - In Trent Dougherty (ed.), Evidentialism and its Discontents. Oxford University Press.
A new argument for evidentialism?Masahiro Yamada - 2010 - Philosophia 38 (2):399-404.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
49 (#295,954)

6 months
1 (#1,149,473)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michael Sudduth
San Francisco State University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Two types of foundationalism.William P. Alston - 1976 - Journal of Philosophy 73 (7):165-185.

Add more references