- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Objective probabilities in expert systems
Artificial Intelligence 61 (2):187-208 (1993)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
On the definition of objective probabilities by empirical similarity.Itzhak Gilboa, Offer Lieberman & David Schmeidler - 2010 - Synthese 172 (1):79 - 95.
Legal implications in development and use of expert systems in agriculture.Willard Downs & Kelley Ann Newton - 1989 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 2 (1):53-58.
Artificial decision-making and artificial ethics: A management concern. [REVIEW]Omar E. M. Khalil - 1993 - Journal of Business Ethics 12 (4):313 - 321.
Expert system technology transfer strategies: Selected cases from the United States and Mexico. [REVIEW]Jay Liebowitz & Francisco J. Cantu-Ortiz - 1992 - AI and Society 6 (4):324-336.
The Foundations of Probability in the Context of Statistical Mechanics.Yair M. Guttmann - 1992 - Dissertation, Columbia University
Expert systems as extensions of the human mind: A user oriented, holistic approach to the design of multiple reasoning system environments and interfaces. [REVIEW]Barbara Gorayska & Kevin Cox - 1992 - AI and Society 6 (3):245-262.
On the definition of objective probabilities by empirical similarity.Itzhak Gilboa, Offer Lieberman & David Schmeidler - 2010 - Synthese 172 (1):79-95.
Two approaches to developing expert systems: A consideration of formal and semi-formal domains. [REVIEW]Edgar A. Whitley - 1991 - AI and Society 5 (2):110-127.
Bayesian decision theory, subjective and objective probabilities, and acceptance of empirical hypotheses.John C. Harsanyi - 1983 - Synthese 57 (3):341 - 365.
Analytics
Added to PP
2020-12-22
Downloads
14 (#934,671)
6 months
13 (#165,103)
2020-12-22
Downloads
14 (#934,671)
6 months
13 (#165,103)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Should causal models always be Markovian? The case of multi-causal forks in medicine.Donald Gillies & Aidan Sudbury - 2013 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 3 (3):275-308.
Debates on Bayesianism and the theory of Bayesian networks.Donald Gillies - 1998 - Theoria 64 (1):1-22.
Using hidden nodes in Bayesian networks.Chee-Keong Kwoh & Duncan Fyfe Gillies - 1996 - Artificial Intelligence 88 (1-2):1-38.
Handling uncertainty in artificial intelligence, and the Bayesian controversy.Donald Gillies - 2004 - In Friedrich Stadler (ed.), Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook. Springer. pp. 199.
References found in this work
The propensity interpretation of probability.Karl R. Popper - 1959 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 10 (37):25-42.
The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science | Vol 73, No 3.Karl R. Popper - 1959 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 10 (38):171-171.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c76586df8-4c2ch uwo