The Closeness Problem for Double Effect: A Reply to Nelkin and Rickless

Journal of Value Inquiry 51 (1):69-83 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/s10790-016-9554-9

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

So Close, Yet So Far: Why Solutions to the Closeness Problem for the Doctrine of Double Effect Fall Short.Dana Kay Nelkin & Samuel C. Rickless - 2013 - Noûs 49 (2):376-409.
The Closeness Problem and the Doctrine of Double Effect: A Way Forward.S. Matthew Liao - 2016 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 10 (4):849-863.
Defending double effect.Ralph Wedgwood - 2011 - Ratio 24 (4):384-401.
The Danger of Double Effect.Philip A. Reed - 2012 - Christian Bioethics 18 (3):287-300.
The accomplishment of plans: a new version of the principle of double effect.Alexander R. Pruss - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 165 (1):49-69.
Intractable Difficulties for the Doctrine of Double Effect: The Problem of Closeness and the Proper Focus of Concern.Ian Allan - unknown
Quinn on double effect: The problem of "closeness".John Martin Fischer, Mark Ravizza & David Copp - 1993 - Ethics 103 (4):707-725.
Reply to Rickless.Antonia LoLordo - 2013 - Locke Studies 13:53-62.
Aristotle and Double Effect.Ezio Di Nucci - 2014 - Journal of Ancient Philosophy 8 (1):20.
How to solve Blum's paradox.D. K. Nelkin & S. C. Rickless - 2001 - Analysis 61 (1):91-94.
Warfield's new argument for incompatibilism.D. K. Nelkin & Samuel C. Rickless - 2002 - Analysis 62 (2):104-107.
The Doctrine of Double Effect.Neil Delaney - 2015 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 89 (3):397-406.
Freedom fighters. [REVIEW]Dana Nelkin & Sam Rickless - 2011 - The Philosophers' Magazine 54 (54):112-113.
The Relevance of Intention to Criminal Wrongdoing.Dana Kay Nelkin & Samuel C. Rickless - 2016 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 10 (4):745-762.
Who is entitled to double effect?Joseph Boyle - 1991 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (5):475-494.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-04-11

Downloads
65 (#240,360)

6 months
10 (#219,185)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Joshua Stuchlik
University of St. Thomas, Minnesota

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references