Hobby horses in Lascaux ? On pictures and semiosis

Argumentation 7 (1):103-117 (1993)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This contribution is about semiology and art history. More specifically, it argues against the frequent claims that art history ought to take much more notice of semiology than it has tended to do so far. The argument against these claims is simple and basic: art history deals largely with images, and semiology does not — it has, in fact, little to say about them.Semiology has recently been presented as a “supra-disciplinary” theory” that, although in practice most often applied to written texts, could equally well be applied to the art of painting. It has been considered merely a “historical accident” that semiotics was developed primarily “in conjunction with literary texts”. I do not think this is so. Semiology (or semiotics) not only has a strong anti-iconical bias, this bias was in fact one of its principles from the very beginning.Furthermore, the so-called “supra-disciplinary theory” of semiotics (in the form advocated for the humanities) is based upon specific views of language, signification and meaning, and these are not as evident as they are often made out to be — not even with regard to language itself. In particular the overriding importance attached to the role of “arbitrariness” within sign systems is questionable.In any case images are indeed in a class of their own, and without the acknowledgement of what is typical about them, it is hard to make much sense of either their use or construction — let alone of the history of art

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,593

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

¿Existen Numeros Fuera de la Matematica?Alfonso Avila del Palacio - 1993 - Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 8 (1):89-112.
Pictures and beauty.Robert Hopkins - 1997 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 97 (2):177–194.
Logical Relations between Pictures.Jan Westerhoff - 2005 - Journal of Philosophy 102 (12):603-623.
Semiosis, Logic, and Language.Gennaro Auletta - 2005 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 5 (1):51-69.
Semiosis as an emergent process.Joao Queiroz & Charbel Nino El-Hani - 2006 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 42 (1):78-116.
Understanding pictures.Dominic Lopes - 1996 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Hallucinatory Pictures.Roberto Casati - 2010 - Acta Analytica 25 (3):365-368.
The universe is my hobby.Dudley Zuver - 1950 - New York,: M. Wheelwright Co..

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-01-18

Downloads
25 (#542,984)

6 months
1 (#1,040,386)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

A Theory of Semiotics.Umberto Eco - 1977 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 10 (3):214-216.
Iconology: Image, Text, Ideology.W. J. T. Mitchell - 1986 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 45 (2):211-214.
A Theory of Semiotics.Robert Scholes - 1977 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 35 (4):476-478.

View all 7 references / Add more references