Epicurus on Death

Grazer Philosophische Studien 37 (1):185-203 (1990)


In this paper I try to state and defend Epicurus ' argument that death is nothing to us. I discuss some of the most prominent objections that have been raised against Epicurus ' position in the recent literature; the authors whose work I discuss include T. Nagel, B.Williams, H. S. Silverstein, and D. Furley. I argue that all of these author's criticisms are flawed in one way or another While this result does not suffice to prove Epicurus right, it does show that Epicurus ' insight is much deeper than many of his critics have suspected.

Download options


    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 72,856

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library


Added to PP

86 (#138,800)

6 months
2 (#257,750)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Leopold Stubenberg
University of Notre Dame

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Deprivation and the See-Saw of Death.Christopher Wareham - 2009 - South African Journal of Philosophy 28 (2):246-56.
Epicurean Equanimity Towards Death.Kai Draper - 2004 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 69 (1):92–114.
Posthumous Harm.Steven Luper - 2004 - American Philosophical Quarterly 41 (1):63 - 72.
Facing Death: Epicurus and His Critics. [REVIEW]Douglas W. Portmore - 2005 - Journal of Value Inquiry 39 (3-4):521-526.
Epicurus.Tim O’Keefe - 2001 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.