Grazer Philosophische Studien 37 (1):185-203 (1990)
AbstractIn this paper I try to state and defend Epicurus ' argument that death is nothing to us. I discuss some of the most prominent objections that have been raised against Epicurus ' position in the recent literature; the authors whose work I discuss include T. Nagel, B.Williams, H. S. Silverstein, and D. Furley. I argue that all of these author's criticisms are flawed in one way or another While this result does not suffice to prove Epicurus right, it does show that Epicurus ' insight is much deeper than many of his critics have suspected.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
No references found.
Citations of this work
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Deprivation and the See-Saw of Death.Christopher Wareham - 2009 - South African Journal of Philosophy 28 (2):246-56.
Epicurean Equanimity Towards Death.Kai Draper - 2004 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 69 (1):92–114.
The Power of Death: Retroactivity, Narrative, and Interest.Patrick Stokes - 2006 - In Robert L. Perkins (ed.), International Kierkegaard Commentary: Prefaces/Writing Sampler and Three Discourses on Imagined Occasions. Mercer University Press.
Facing Death: Epicurus and His Critics. [REVIEW]Douglas W. Portmore - 2005 - Journal of Value Inquiry 39 (3-4):521-526.
Tim O’Keefe, Epicurus on Freedom (Cambridge University Press, 2005). [REVIEW]J. S. Swindell Blumenthal-Barby - 2007 - Journal of Value Inquiry 41 (1):107-112.
The Moral Virtues and Instrumentalism in Epicurus.Kristian Urstad - 2010 - Lyceum.
The Reductionist and Compatibilist Argument of Epicurus' On Nature, Book 25.Tim O'Keefe - 2002 - Phronesis 47 (2):153-186.
James Warren, Epicurus and Democritean Ethics: An Archaeology of Ataraxia. [REVIEW]Tim O'Keefe - 2003 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2003 (5).
The Ontological Status of Sensible Qualities for Democritus and Epicurus.Timothy O’Keefe - 1997 - Ancient Philosophy 17 (1):119-134.