A Reconsideration of the Status of Newton's Laws

In Michael J. Shaffer & Michael Veber (eds.), What Place for the a Priori? Open Court. pp. 177 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I look at the debates of the status of Newton's laws, whether they can each, or all together be considered emprical or a priori.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Laws in Physics.Mathias Frisch - 2014 - European Review 22:S33-S49.
Infinity and Newton’s Three Laws of Motion.Chunghyoung Lee - 2011 - Foundations of Physics 41 (12):1810-1828.
Newton's concepts of force and mass, with notes on the Laws of Motion.I. Bernard Cohen - 2002 - In I. Bernard Cohen & George E. Smith (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Newton. Cambridge University Press. pp. 57--84.
Reflections on parity nonconservation.Nick Huggett - 2000 - Philosophy of Science 67 (2):219-241.
Newtonian Science, Miracles, and the Laws of Nature.Peter Harrison - 1995 - Journal of the History of Ideas 56 (4):531 - 553.
The Status of Laws of Nature in the Philosophy of Leibniz.Karen R. Zwier - 2011 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 85:149-160.
The logical status of natural laws.R. A. Sharpe - 1964 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 7 (1-4):414-416.
Stability and lawlikeness.Jani Raerinne - 2013 - Biology and Philosophy 28 (5):833-851.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-02-02

Downloads
29 (#518,760)

6 months
5 (#526,961)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references