An Objection to Swinburne’s Argument for Dualism

Faith and Philosophy 13 (3):405-412 (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Similar books and articles

Dualism Intact.Richard Swinburne - 1996 - Faith and Philosophy 13 (1):68-77.
Swinburne's Argument for Dualism.Thomas W. Smythe - 1994 - Faith and Philosophy 11 (1):127-133.
Swinburne’s Modal Argument for Dualism.William Hasker - 1998 - Faith and Philosophy 15 (3):366-370.
Varieties of Dualism: Swinburne and Aquinas.Jason T. Eberl - 2010 - International Philosophical Quarterly 50 (1):39-56.
Reply to Stump and Kretzmann.Richard Swinburne - 1996 - Faith and Philosophy 13 (3):413-414.
On A Wittgensteinian Objection to Kripke’s Dualism Argument.Richard Double - 1981 - Philosophy Research Archives 1414:171-181.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
462 (#36,132)

6 months
200 (#10,250)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Eleonore Stump
Saint Louis University

Citations of this work

Substance Dualism and Disembodied Existence.Nicholas Everitt - 2000 - Faith and Philosophy 17 (3):333-347.
Swinburne’s Modal Argument for Dualism.William Hasker - 1998 - Faith and Philosophy 15 (3):366-370.
Different Arguments, Same Problems. Modal ambiguity and tricky substitutions.Rafal Urbaniak - 2017 - European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 13 (2):5-22.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Hard-type soft facts.John Martin Fischer - 1986 - Philosophical Review 95 (4):591-601.

Add more references