Walker's Machiavelli [Book Review]

Review of Metaphysics 6 (3):437-446 (1953)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Walker feels that his contention regarding the novelty of Machiavelli's method is in need of proof. He asserts that "the practice of considering negative instances was far more extensively used by St. Thomas Aquinas than it was by Machiavelli, who is but a tyro in this respect." "But neither St. Thomas nor any other mediaeval thinker... [proves his] theorems by citing similar instances taken from ancient and contemporary history," to say nothing of other differences between their procedure and that of Machiavelli. Walker admits that "there are... similarities in method, some of them quite striking," between Machiavelli and Aristotle. But "there are also marked differences." "Aristotle's Politics contains at least as many, if not more, precepts or maxims than the Discourses of Machiavelli, but rarely does Aristotle cite even a single historical example to show that in practice they would work, whereas Machiavelli invariably cites several..." Furthermore, Machiavelli's method, in contradistinction to Aristotle's, is "essentially historical." It was "to his reading of ancient historians," and apparently not to his study of Aristotle, that "Machiavelli's interest in history and his realization of its significance to the politician was undoubtedly due". It would then seem that the new method emerged by virtue of a synthesis between Aristotle's political philosophy and "history," i.e. coherent records of past events.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,593

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Thoughts on Machiavelli.Leo Strauss - 1978 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Review: Walker's Machiavelli. [REVIEW]Leo Strauss - 1953 - Review of Metaphysics 6 (3):437 - 446.
The Political calculus.Niccolò Machiavelli & Anthony Parel (eds.) - 1972 - [Toronto]: University of Toronto Press.
The Cambridge companion to Machiavelli.John M. Najemy (ed.) - 2010 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Machiavelli and empire.Mikael Hörnqvist - 2004 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Machiavelli.Quentin Skinner - 1992 - In Great Political Thinkers. Oxford University Press.
Machiavelli.Maurizio Viroli - 1998 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Getting our bearings : Machiavelli and Hume.John W. Danford - 2006 - In Paul Anthony Rahe (ed.), Machiavelli's Liberal Republican Legacy. Cambridge University Press.
Machiavelli in the English revolution.Paul A. Rahe - 2006 - In Paul Anthony Rahe (ed.), Machiavelli's Liberal Republican Legacy. Cambridge University Press.
The portable Machiavelli.Niccolò Machiavelli - 1979 - New York: Penguin Books. Edited by Peter Bondanella & Mark Musa.
Niccolò Machiavelli : a portrait.James B. Atkinson - 2010 - In John M. Najemy (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Machiavelli. Cambridge University Press. pp. 1--13.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-03-18

Downloads
22 (#606,933)

6 months
1 (#1,040,386)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The Crisis of Modernity in The Works of Hannah Arendt and Leo Strauss. Differences That Clarify Common Problems.Dolores Amat - 2019 - Las Torres de Lucca. International Journal of Political Philosophy 8 (15):81-106.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references