Scanlon versus Moore on goodness

&
In T. Horgan & M. Timmons (eds.), Metaethics after Moore. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 149-168 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Scanlon versus Moore on goodness.Philip Stratton-Lake & Brad Hooker - 2006 - In Terry Horgan & Mark Timmons (eds.), Metaethics After Moore. Oxford University Press. pp. 149.
The Buck-Passing Stops Here.Andrew Moore - 2012 - In Rationis Defensor.
Goodness and reasons: A response to Stratton-lake.Roger Crisp - 2009 - Mind 118 (472):1095-1099.
Can Scanlon avoid redundancy by passing the buck?David McNaughton & Piers Rawling - 2003 - Analysis 63 (4):328–331.
Goodness and reasons: Accentuating the negative.Roger Crisp - 2008 - Mind 117 (466):257-265.
G. E. Moore on goodness and reasons.Jonas Olson - 2006 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 84 (4):525 – 534.
Might anything be plain good?Thomas Byrne - 2016 - Philosophical Studies 173 (12):3335-3346.
Non-cognitivism in ethics: A modest proposal for its diagnosis and cure.Henry Veatch - 1966 - Ethics 76 (2):102-116.
Scanlon, permissions, and redundancy: Response to McNaughton and Rawling.Philip Stratton-Lake - 2003 - Analysis 63 (4):332–337.
The buck passing account of value: assessing the negative thesis.Philip Stratton-Lake - unknown
In what follows, we shall bring out as clearly as possible these points of similarities that Moore's thinking on goodness have with phenomenological thinking on values.S. Moore - 2001 - Indian Philosophical Quarterly 28:N0 - 2.
Two Construals of Scanlon’s Contractualism.Philip Pettit & T. M. Scanlon - 2000 - Journal of Philosophy 97 (3):148-164.
Contractualism, spare wheel, aggregation.Brad Hooker - 2002 - In Matt Matravers (ed.), Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy. Frank Cass. pp. 53-76.
Aristoteles und der naturalistische Fehlschluß.Jörn Müller - 2006 - Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch Fur Antike Und Mittelalter 11:25-58.
Scanlon and the claims of the many versus the one.Michael Otsuka - 2000 - Analysis 60 (3):288-293.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-07-21

Downloads
23 (#664,515)

6 months
8 (#342,364)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Brad Hooker
University of Reading
Philip Stratton-Lake
University of Reading

Citations of this work

Fittingness.Christopher Howard - 2018 - Philosophy Compass 13 (11):e12542.
Value and reasons to favour.Jonathan Way - 2013 - Oxford Studies in Metaethics 8.
The Supervenience Challenge to Non-Naturalism.Pekka Väyrynen - 2017 - In Tristram Colin McPherson & David Plunkett (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Metaethics. New York: Routledge. pp. 170-84.
Might All Normativity be Queer?Matthew S. Bedke - 2010 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88 (1):41-58.
The myth of the myth of supervenience.David Mark Kovacs - 2019 - Philosophical Studies 176 (8):1967-1989.

View all 24 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references