Scanlon versus Moore on goodness

In Terry Horgan & Mark Timmons (eds.), Metaethics After Moore. Oxford University Press. pp. 149 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 89,378

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Hyperventilating about intrinsic value.Fred Feldman - 1998 - The Journal of Ethics 2 (4):339-354.
Buck-passing accounts of value.Jussi Suikkanen - 2009 - Philosophy Compass 4 (5):768-779.
Buck-passing and the wrong kind of reasons.Jonas Olson - 2004 - Philosophical Quarterly 54 (215):295–300.
The buck-passing account of value: lessons from Crisp.S. Matthew Liao - 2010 - Philosophical Studies 151 (3):421 - 432.
Mill, Moore, and Intrinsic Value.Guy Fletcher - 2008 - Social Theory and Practice 34 (4):517-32.
G. E. Moore on goodness and reasons.Jonas Olson - 2006 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 84 (4):525 – 534.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
65 (#222,052)

6 months
9 (#141,525)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Brad Hooker
University of Reading

Citations of this work

Fittingness.Christopher Howard - 2018 - Philosophy Compass 13 (11):e12542.
Intrinsic vs. extrinsic value.Michael J. Zimmerman - 2019 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Value and reasons to favour.Jonathan Way - 2013 - Oxford Studies in Metaethics 8.
Fitting attitudes and welfare.Chris Heathwood - 2008 - Oxford Studies in Metaethics 3:47-73.

View all 35 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references