How Did Regius Become Regius? The Early Doctrinal Evolution of a Heterodox Cartesian

Early Science and Medicine 23 (4):362-412 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article offers an assessment of Henricus Regius’s (1598-1679) pre-Cartesian sources and their role in his appropriation of Descartes’s ideas, via two main questions: 1) Who was Regius, doctrinally speaking, before his exposure to Cartesianism? And 2) how did he use Descartes’s theories before his quarrel with Descartes himself in the mid-1640s? These questions are addressed by means of a textual analysis that concerns his theory of matter. In this article, I will show that 1) Regius started out with a scientific program he had found in Ramism and the medical theories of Heurnius and Santorio. 2) On this basis, he developed a physiology encompassing Descartes’s theory of blood circulation and sensory perception. 3) Regius completed the resulting physiology with a theory of matter more developed than Descartes’s, and which he appropriated from Santorio, Basson, and Gorlaeus.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Early Dutch Reception of L’Homme.Tad M. Schmaltz - 2016 - In Stephen Gaukroger & Delphine Antoine-Mahut (eds.), Descartes' Treatise on Man and Its Reception. Springer.
Regius and Gassendi on the Human Soul.Vlad Alexandrescu - 2013 - Intellectual History Review 23 (2):433-452.
Il carteggio. Le polemiche.René Descartes, Henricus Regius & Roberto Bordoli - 2001 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 63 (1):171-172.
The curious case of Henricus Regius.Tad M. Schmaltz - 2019 - In Steven Nadler, Tad M. Schmaltz & Delphine Antoine-Mahut (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Descartes and Cartesianism. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Henricus regius.Desmond Clarke - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Henricus Regius, een "Cartesiaansch" Hoogleeraar aan de Utrechtsche Hoogeschool. [REVIEW]Arnold Dresden - 1918 - Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 15 (18):500-503.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-01-12

Downloads
22 (#690,757)

6 months
13 (#182,749)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Andrea Strazzoni
Università di Torino

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references