God’s creatures? Divine nature and the status of animals in the early modern beast-machine controversy

International Journal of Philosophy and Theology 74 (4):291-309 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In early modern times it was not uncommon for thinkers to tease out from the nature of God various doctrines of substantial physical and metaphysical import. This approach was particularly fruitful in the so-called beast-machine controversy, which erupted following Descartes’ claim that animals are automata, that is, pure machines, without a spiritual, incorporeal soul. Over the course of this controversy, thinkers on both sides attempted to draw out important truths about the status of animals simply from the notion or attributes of God. Automatists – led by Nicolas Malebranche and Antoine Dilly – developed six such arguments, appealing to divine justice, providence, economy, glory (twice) and wisdom, while opponents to animal automatism developed two arguments, appealing to divine wisdom and goodness. In this article I shall examine the substance of all eight of these arguments, along with their origins, patronage, and variations, and the objections they elicited from opponents, with the aim of determining their suitability for use in contemporary debates about animal sentience and consciousness, and hence their relevance for contemporary philosophers.

Similar books and articles

Zoologian Jurisprudence.Piyel Haldar - 2011 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 24 (3):291-306.
DAKO on Trial.Kimberly Bonia, Fern Brunger, Laura Fullerton, Chad Griffiths & Chris Kaposy - 2012 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 16 (3):275-295.
Omniscience and experience.Marcel Sarot - 1991 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 30 (2):89 - 102.
The Nature of the Beast. [REVIEW]Peter Miller - 1987 - Environmental Ethics 9 (3):277-279.
Tierseele und tierethische Argumentationen in der deutschen philosophischen Literatur des 18. Jahrhunderts.Hans Werner Ingensiep - 1996 - NTM Zeitschrift für Geschichte der Wissenschaften, Technik und Medizin 4 (1):103-118.
Are animals capable of concepts?Achim Stephan - 1999 - Erkenntnis 51 (1):583-596.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-26

Downloads
403 (#44,898)

6 months
124 (#24,385)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Lloyd Strickland
Manchester Metropolitan University

Citations of this work

Descartes and his critics on passions and animals.Evan Thomas - 2022 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 30 (5):773-796.
Do we Need a Plant Theodicy?Lloyd Strickland - 2021 - Scientia et Fides 9 (2):221-246.

Add more citations