Utilitas 15 (2):237-47 (2003)

Authors
Bart Streumer
University of Groningen
Abstract
Derek Parfit, Philip Pettit and Michael Smith defend a version of consequentialism that covers everything. I argue that this version of consequentialism is false. Consequentialism, I argue, can only cover things that belong to a combination of things that agents can bring about.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s0953820800003976
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,018
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Reasons and Persons.Joseph Margolis - 1986 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 47 (2):311-327.
Alienation, Consequentialism, and the Demands of Morality.Peter Railton - 1984 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 13 (2):134-171.
An Outline of a System of Utilitarian Ethics.J. J. C. SMART - 1961 - [Carlton]Melbourne University Press on Behalf of the University of Adelaide.
A Theory of the Good and the Right.Richard Brandt - 1979 - Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 35 (2):307-310.
A Theory of the Good and the Right.Richard B. Brandt - 1979 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 44 (1):181-182.

View all 14 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Ambitions of Consequentialism.Brian McElwee - 2020 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 17 (2):198--218.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
206 ( #55,002 of 2,498,540 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #426,098 of 2,498,540 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes