Autonomy concerns with using contracts to enhance patient adherence

Bioethics 36 (6):666-672 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The failure of many patients with chronic conditions to correctly follow medical advice that they hope or intend to follow is a major concern, especially as effective long‐term therapies for chronic conditions materialize. Some US healthcare providers have responded with strategies that involve implementing contracts with their patients, including provisions that may deny future treatments after continued nonadherence. This is among the first articles to explicitly discuss the ethics of patient contracts.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Protecting autonomy as authenticity using Ulysses contracts.Theo Van Willigenburg & Patrick Delaere - 2005 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (4):395 – 409.
Why Decision-making Capacity Matters.Ben Schwan - 2021 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 19 (5):447-473.
Reviving Ulysses contracts.Ryan Spellecy - 2003 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 13 (4):373-392.
Can Contracts Enhance Participant Autonomy in Clinical Trials?Diana Buccafurni - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (4):24-25.
The Evolution of Autonomy.Trevor Stammers - 2015 - The New Bioethics 21 (2):155-163.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-04-23

Downloads
16 (#851,323)

6 months
7 (#339,156)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ben Schwan
Case Western Reserve University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references