The sex of nature: A reinterpretation of Irigaray's metaphysics and political thought

Hypatia 18 (3):60-84 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

: I argue that Irigaray's recent work develops a theoretically cogent and politically radical form of realist essentialism. I suggest that she identifies sexual difference with a fundamental difference between the rhythms of percipient fluids constituting women's and men's bodies, supporting this with a philosophy of nature that she justifies phenomenologically and ethically. I explore the politics Irigaray derives from this philosophy, which affirms the sexes' rights to realize the possibilities of their rhythmically diverse bodies

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
74 (#218,358)

6 months
14 (#170,850)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Alison Stone
Lancaster University

References found in this work

Mind and World.John McDowell - 1994 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Critique of pure reason.Immanuel Kant - 1781/1998 - In Elizabeth Schmidt Radcliffe, Richard McCarty, Fritz Allhoff & Anand Vaidya (eds.), Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. Blackwell. pp. 449-451.

View all 43 references / Add more references