The Divided Line of Plato Rep. VI

Classical Quarterly 5 (02):73- (1911)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

At the end of the Sixth Book of the Republic Plato explains the Idea of Good by means of the Figure of the Sun. As the sun is the cause both of the becoming of that which is subject to becoming and of our apprehension of it and of its changes through the eye, so the idea of good is the cause of the being of that which is and also of our knowledge of it. As the sun is beyond γxs22EFνεσις, so the Idea of Good is beyond Being. Glaucon says he does not understand. The simile is further elucidated by means of a line, divided into two parts, of which one stands for the νιητxs22EFν γxs22EFνος τε καxs22EF τxs22EFπος, where the Idea of Good bears rule, the other for the xs22EFρατxs22EFν γxs22EFνος τε καxs22EF τxs22EFπος, over which the sun is lord. The line is to be divided unequally , and subdivided in the same proportions. Thus we get a line consisting of four parts in the ratio 4 : 6 : : 6 : 9. Let us call the four parts A B C D respectively, A being the smallest, D the greatest, B and C necessarily equal. A stands for εxs1F31κxs22EFνες, shadows, images in water and on polished surfaces, and the like: B stands for animals, plants, and the creations of human industry: C for the objects of that enquiry in which the objects denoted by B are treated as images, i.e. mathematical enquiries: D for the objects apprehended by dialectic, the Ideas themselves. The first equation asserted is—The objects of opinion : objects of knowledge : : representation : original . There follows an explanation of the inferiority of mathematical to philosophical reasoning, and an explanation of the statement that the objects denoted by B are used as images or symbols by the enquiry concerned with C; as a result of which Glaucon perceives that the general distinction between C and D is that between the τxs22EFχναι , i.e. those sciences in which the Guardians were to be educated, and Philosophy or Dialectic. Finally a special πxs22EFθημα or affection of the soul is allotted to each of the four divisions of the line, to A εxs1F31κασxs22EFα, to B πxs22EFστις, to C διxs22EFνοια, to D νxs22EFησις, each πxs22EFθημα being clear in the same degree in which the objects it is concerned with are true

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Double Vision.Matthew S. Linck - 2008 - Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 13 (1):25-47.
Plato's Divided Line and Dialectic.R. Hackforth - 1942 - Classical Quarterly 36 (1-2):1-.
Plato’s Divided Line.Nicholas D. Smith - 1996 - Ancient Philosophy 16 (1):25-46.
Plato's Divided Line.Lynn E. Rose - 1964 - Review of Metaphysics 17 (3):425 - 435.
Plato's Divided Line.Robert S. Brumbaugh - 1952 - Review of Metaphysics 5 (4):529 - 534.
A note on Plato's divided line.Robert Hahn - 1983 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 21 (2):235-237.
The Driving Ratio in Plato’s Divided Line.John Paul Dreher - 1990 - Ancient Philosophy 10 (2):159-172.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-12-09

Downloads
61 (#257,990)

6 months
11 (#226,803)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

What is Eikasia?Damien Storey - 2020 - Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 58:19-57.
The 'Simile Of Light' In Plato'S Republic.N. R. Murphy - 1932 - Classical Quarterly 26 (02):93-.
Dianoia & Plato’s Divided Line.Damien Storey - 2022 - Phronesis 67 (3):253-308.
Seeing Through Images: The Bottom of Plato’s Divided Line.Yancy Hughes Dominick - 2009 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 48 (1):pp. 1-13.

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references