The Doxastic Ideal in Traditional Epistemology and the Project of an Epistemology of Religion

Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies 8 (22):53-62 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The standard definition of knowledge and the concept of objective knowledge, as they were described in the epistemology sprung from the Vienna Circle, are too restricted in comparison with our natural disposal to admit different beliefs as reliable. The main guilt for this state of arts in epistemology belongs to the so- called, in Wolterstorff’s terms, “doxastic ideal”, namely, the traditional picture of the ideally formed beliefs. Locke’s view of entitlement was the modern expression of this ideal and Hume’s analysis of beliefs about future was its first powerful criticism. If we succeed in rejecting this ideal, then it become possible to extend the epistemological analysis over other sorts of beliefs, religious beliefs included

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,261

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The epistemology of belief.Hamid Vahid - 2009 - New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Holding the Faith True.John Zeis - 2013 - Res Philosophica 90 (2):161-170.
Epistemological externalism and the project of traditional epistemology.Adam Leite - 2005 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 70 (3):505–533.
Doxastic Voluntarism: A Sceptical Defence.Danny Frederick - 2013 - International Journal for the Study of Skepticism 3 (1):24-44.
Formal Representations of Belief.Franz Huber - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
How We Choose Our Beliefs.Gregory Salmieri & Benjamin Bayer - 2014 - Philosophia 42 (1):41–53.
Belief Revision I: The AGM Theory.Franz Huber - 2013 - Philosophy Compass 8 (7):604-612.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-24

Downloads
25 (#636,619)

6 months
8 (#370,225)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Constantin Stoenescu
University of Bucharest

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Theory of Knowledge.Charles A. Baylis - 1967 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 28 (4):600-601.
Epistemology of Religion.Nicholas Wolterstorff - 2017 - In John Greco & Ernest Sosa (eds.), The Blackwell Guide to Epistemology. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. pp. 303–324.

Add more references