Science deniers reject authority and facts

Australian Humanist, The 121:16 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Stokes, Patrick Many people who choose to ignore accepted scientific conclusions are making emotional rather than rational decisions.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The intuition deniers.Jennifer Nado - 2016 - Philosophical Studies 173 (3):781-800.
Science and the Ethics of Belief. An Examination of Philipse’s ‘Rule R’.René van Woudenberg & Joelle Rothuizen-van der Steen - 2016 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 47 (2):349-362.
Moral Objectivity.Tad Dunne - 2003 - Journal of Macrodynamic Analysis 3:142-166.
A New Conception of Science.Nicholas Maxwell - 2000 - Physics World 13 (8):17-18.
Normative authority for empirical science.Wim de Muijnck - 2011 - Philosophical Explorations 14 (3):263-275.
Dynamics of Theory Change: The Role of Predictions.Stephen G. Brush - 1994 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:133 - 145.
On not worshipping facts.J. R. Lucas - 1958 - Philosophical Quarterly 8 (31):144-156.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-23

Downloads
12 (#1,054,764)

6 months
1 (#1,533,009)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Patrick Stokes
Deakin University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references