Oxford, UK: Oxford, Clarendon Press (1973)
AbstractThis book aims to discuss probability and David Hume's inductive scepticism. For the sceptical view which he took of inductive inference, Hume only ever gave one argument. That argument is the sole subject-matter of this book. The book is divided into three parts. Part one presents some remarks on probability. Part two identifies Hume's argument for inductive scepticism. Finally, the third part evaluates Hume's argument for inductive scepticism. Hume's argument that induction must be either deductively valid or circular because based on experience neglects the possibility that it is an argument of non-deductive logic (logical probability, in the sense of Keynes).
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
No references found.
Citations of this work
Corrupting the Youth: A History of Philosophy in Australia.James Franklin - 2003 - Sydney, Australia: Macleay Press.
What Did Hume Really Show About Induction?Samir Okasha - 2001 - Philosophical Quarterly 51 (204):307-327.
Probability and Hume's Inductive Scepticism.D. C. Stove - 1973 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 35 (3):646-647.
Similar books and articles
Probabilistic Induction and Hume’s Problem: Reply to Lange.Samir Okasha - 2003 - Philosophical Quarterly 53 (212):419–424.
Probability and Hume's Inductive Scepticism. By D. C. Stove. Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1973. Pp. 132. £ 3.00. [REVIEW]James Noxon - 1973 - Dialogue 12 (4):735-741.
Probability and Hume's Inductive Scepticism. [REVIEW]Clifford A. Hooker - 1975 - Hume Studies 1 (1):25-29.
Probability and Hume’s Inductive Scepticism. [REVIEW]Maria Wolf - 1976 - Philosophical Studies (Dublin) 25:353-353.
Optimum Inductive Methods: A Study in Inductive Probability, Bayesian Statistics, and Verisimilitude.Roberto Festa - 1993 - Dordrecht, Netherland: Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht.