On Davies' argument from relational properties

Acta Analytica 20 (4):24-31 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In Art as Performance , David Davies identifies certain properties relevant to artistic appreciation of artworks that, he suggests, are naturally construed as belonging to the artist’s creative performance rather than to any product of that performance (the “work-product”). He further argues, against an anticipated opponent, that such properties cannot be excluded as irrelevant to artistic appreciation in any principled way. I argue that the cited properties can be intelligibly construed as properties of the associated work-product, whether or not they are relevant to artistic appreciation; but that some are not relevant to artistic appreciation. In doing so, I offer a principle determining when a property of an artwork is relevant to artistic appreciation. I conclude that, on its own, Davies’s argument offers no good grounds to abandon our practice of thinking of the artwork as the product of an artist’s activity, rather than the activity itself.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,479

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
50 (#237,153)

6 months
1 (#455,463)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Kathleen Stock
University of Sussex

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

What a musical work is.Jerrold Levinson - 1980 - Journal of Philosophy 77 (1):5-28.
Art as Performance.Dave Davies - 2003 - Wiley-Blackwell.
Art as Performance.David Davies - 2005 - Philosophical Quarterly 55 (221):694-696.
Art as Performance.Robert Stecker - 2005 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 63 (1):77-80.

Add more references