Laws and singular propositions

Australasian Journal of Philosophy 51 (2):139 – 143 (1973)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The author claims to prove by example that, Contrary to what is generally maintained, A singular preposition of an observational kind is in some cases deducible from a natural law alone. On this basis he raises the question whether the universe might not be deterministic in a 'hyper-Laplacean' sense: that is, Whether the laws of nature might not be logically sufficient on their own to determine every actual state of the universe

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 104,101

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Law Governed Universe.John T. Roberts - 2008 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Freedom and Determinism.Jenann Ismael - forthcoming - Philosophical Explorations.
Singular Causation and Law.Gurol Irzik - 1990 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:537 - 543.
Divine Lawmaker.John Foster - 2004 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press UK.
Propositions and Parthood: The Universe and Anti-Symmetry.Chris Tillman & Gregory Fowler - 2012 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90 (3):525 - 539.
Contingently existing propositions.Michael Nelson - 2013 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 43 (5):776-803.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
138 (#167,884)

6 months
6 (#697,129)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references