Epigenetics: ambiguities and implications

History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 38 (4):1-20 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Everyone has heard of ‘epigenetics’, but the term means different things to different researchers. Four important contemporary meanings are outlined in this paper. Epigenetics in its various senses has implications for development, heredity, and evolution, and also for medicine. Concerning development, it cements the vision of a reactive genome strongly coupled to its environment. Concerning heredity, both narrowly epigenetic and broader ‘exogenetic’ systems of inheritance play important roles in the construction of phenotypes. A thoroughly epigenetic model of development and evolution was Waddington’s aim when he introduced the term ‘epigenetics’ in the 1940s, but it has taken the modern development of molecular epigenetics to realize this aim. In the final sections of the paper we briefly outline some further implications of epigenetics for medicine and for the nature/nurture debate.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Epigenetic Exceptionalism.Mark A. Rothstein - 2013 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 41 (3):733-736.
Genetics and philosophy : an introduction.Paul Griffiths & Karola Stotz - 2013 - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
A niche for the genome.Karola Stotz & Paul Griffiths - 2016 - Biology and Philosophy 31 (1):143-157.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-11-18

Downloads
68 (#235,492)

6 months
22 (#119,049)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Paul Edmund Griffiths
University of Sydney
Karola Stotz
Last affiliation: Macquarie University

Citations of this work

Gene.Hans-Jörg Rheinberger - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Perspectivism in current epigenetics.Karim Bschir - 2020 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 10 (3):1-18.

View all 11 citations / Add more citations