Buddhism Beyond Morality: A Note on Two Senses of Transcendence

Journal of Religious Ethics 6 (2):319 - 325 (1978)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper takes up the claim, made in some Buddhist texts, that one can transcend morality. The author distinguishes a weak and a strong sense in which this might be so, and explicates the strong sense in terms of Strawson's notion of presupposition.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Justifying group-specific common morality.Carson Strong - 2008 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29 (1):1-15.
Living beautifully with uncertainty and change.Pema Chödrön - 2012 - Boston: Shambhala. Edited by Joan Duncan Oliver.
The senses of functions in the logic of sense and denotation.Kevin C. Klement - 2010 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 16 (2):153-188.
Taxonomising the Senses.Fiona Macpherson - 2011 - Philosophical Studies 153 (1):123-142.
Double exposure: cutting across Buddhist and Western discourses.Bernard Faure - 2004 - Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press. Edited by Janet Lloyd.
The significance of the senses.Matthew Nudds - 2004 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 104 (1):31-51.
Transcendence without reality.John R. Wright - 2005 - Philosophy 80 (3):361-384.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
21 (#720,615)

6 months
2 (#1,240,909)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references