Affectivity and Self‐Concern: The Assumed Psychology in Aristotle's Ethics

Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 64 (3):211-229 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Some problems about affectivity.Michael Stocker - 2002 - Philosophical Studies 108 (1-2):151-158.
Aristotle: critical assessments.Lloyd P. Gerson (ed.) - 1999 - New York: Routledge.
Review of Aristotle’s psychology. [REVIEW]James E. Faulconer - 1990 - Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 10 (1):51-53.
A Non-Aretaic Return to Aristotle.Leo Zaibert - 2011 - Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie 97 (2):235-250.
Aristotle.J. M. E. Moravcsik - 1967 - Garden City, N.Y.,: Anchor Books.
The Meaning of Aristocracy in Aristotle's Political Thought.Liz Anne Alexander - 1997 - Dissertation, University of Toronto (Canada)
An Axiomatic Approach to Aristotle’s Ethics.Michael Winter - 2001 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 75:211-220.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-02

Downloads
9 (#1,228,347)

6 months
4 (#800,606)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Idealist Origins: 1920s and Before.Martin Davies & Stein Helgeby - 2014 - In Graham Oppy & Nick Trakakis (eds.), History of Philosophy in Australia and New Zealand. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer. pp. 15-54.
Why Did Psammenitus Not Pity His Son?Aaron Ben-Zeev - 1990 - Analysis 50 (2):118 - 126.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Self-Respect and Respect for Others: Are They Independent?David Sachs - 1982 - Tulane Studies in Philosophy 31:109-128.

Add more references