Μέγιστα Γένη and Division in Aristotle’s Generation of Animals

Apeiron 46 (1):1-25 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Aristotle refers to some animal kinds as μέγιστα γένη, or greatest kinds. The goal of this paper is to make clear the nature and significance of these kinds. I argue that Aristotle thinks of greatest kinds as the most general kinds within a specified domain. I then consider the fact that Aristotle’s discussion of animals’ reproductive parts and modes of reproduction in Generation of Animals is organized around divisions related to the cause of each of the features being explained. I conclude that, while classification is an important goal in Aristotle’s biological treatises, it is of little significance that some of the kinds he identifies are referred to as greatest kinds. The important divisions are, for Aristotle, the divisions that best serve his goal of explaining the various features of animals and these divisions sometimes group together and sometimes cut across the commonly recognized, including the greatest, animal kinds.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Aristotle’s Generation of Animals.Devin Henry - 2009 - In Georgios Anagnostopoulos (ed.), A Companion to Aristotle. Blackwell-Wiley.
Aristotle on Monsters and the Generation of Kinds.Thomas V. Upton - 2003 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 77 (1):21-36.
División, definición y diferencia en los "Tópicos".Andrea Falcon - 2002 - Anuario Filosófico 35 (73):297-312.
Empirical Eulogos Argumentation in GA III 10.Joseph Karbowski - 2014 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 22 (1):25-38.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-04

Downloads
26 (#574,431)

6 months
7 (#339,156)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Byron J. Stoyles
Trent University