Nancy Reagan Wears a Hat: Feminism and Its Cultural Consensus

Critical Inquiry 14 (2):223-243 (1988)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Like every great word, “representation/s “ is a stew. A scrambled menu, it serves up several meanings at once. For a representation can be an image—visual, verbal, or aural. Think of a picture of a hat. A representation can also be a narrative, a sequence of images and ideas. Think of the sentence, “Nancy Reagan wore a hat when she visited a detoxification clinic in Florida.” Or, a representation can be the product of ideology, that vast scheme for showing forth the world and justifying its dealings. Think of the sentence, “Nancy Reagan, in her hat, is a proper woman.” In the past twenty years, feminist thinking about representation has broken apart. This fracture is both cause and symptom of the larger collapse of a feminist cultural consensus. Some of the rifts have been thematic. That is to be represented? Others have been theoretical. What is the nature of representation itself? I wish to map these rifts, especially those in the United States, and to wonder about the logic of a new cultural consensus.In the late 1960s, feminists began to share a cultural consensus about the representation of women and gender. Few who built up that consensus were village idiots. Even without being semioticians, everyone more or less knew that the marriages between the signifier and the signified in that odd couple, the sign, were ones of convenience. Everyone more or less knew that the marriages between the sign and the referent, that hubbub out there, or somewhere, were also ones of convenience. Some survived. Others were obsolete, cold, hostile, ending in separation or divorce. Everyone more or less knew that when I exclaimed, “Nancy Reagan wears a hat,” it was easier for a fellow citizen of my linguistic community to understand me than for a stranger to do so. Nevertheless, the consensus offered a rough, general theory of representation that extolled the possibility of a fit between “reality” and its “description” or “image.” Catharine R. Stimpson is professor of English and dean of the Graduate School at Rutgers University. She is presently at work on a book about Gertrude Stein

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Feminism and cultural studies.Morag Shiach (ed.) - 1999 - New York: Oxford University Press.
The Second Feminism.Nancy Bauer - 2007 - Symposia on Gender, Race, and Philosophy.
Science and Technology: Questions for Cultural Studies and for Feminism'.S. Franklin & M. McNeil - 1991 - In Sarah Franklin, Celia Lury & Jackie Stacey (eds.), Off-Centre: Feminism and Cultural Studies. Harpercollins Academic.
Off-centre: feminism and cultural studies.Sarah Franklin, Celia Lury & Jackie Stacey (eds.) - 1991 - New York, NY, USA: HarperCollins Academic.
Having it All: Feminism and the Pleasures of the Popular.Yvonne Tasker - 1991 - In Sarah Franklin, Celia Lury & Jackie Stacey (eds.), Off-Centre: Feminism and Cultural Studies. Harpercollins Academic. pp. 85--96.
Performance and death: Ronald Reagan.Peggy Phelan - 1999 - Cultural Values 3 (1):100-122.
Feminism, Marxism and Thatcherism.Sarah Franklin, Celia Lury & Jackie Stacey - 1991 - In Sarah Franklin, Celia Lury & Jackie Stacey (eds.), Off-Centre: Feminism and Cultural Studies. Harpercollins Academic. pp. 21--46.
How to Do Things With Pornography.Nancy Bauer - 2015 - Harvard Univeristy Press. Edited by Sanford Shieh & Alice Crary.
Adorno, culture, and feminism.Maggie O'Neill (ed.) - 1999 - Thousand Oaks, Calif.: SAGE Publications.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-17

Downloads
17 (#846,424)

6 months
4 (#790,687)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references