Construction vs. Development: Polarizing Models of Human Gestation

Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 24 (4):345-384 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

If we distance ourselves from the content of the debate for and against the destruction of human embryos for scientific research purposes, we may be struck by its rhetorical form. Each side thinks not only that it has the superior argument, but that its conclusion is wholly obvious, while the other side’s position is obviously mistaken. Those who defend splitting embryos to obtain stem cells say that it is ridiculous to claim that a tiny zygote or blastocyst without a brain is the same sort of being as we, while those who oppose this research claim it to be clear as day that each of us is the same being we were when newly conceived, though now ..

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,925

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The moral status of stem cells.Agata Sagan & Peter Singer - 2007 - Metaphilosophy 38 (2-3):264–284.
Killing embryos for stem cell research.Jeff Mcmahan - 2007 - Metaphilosophy 38 (2-3):170–189.
Abortion, embryonic stem cell research, and waste.David A. Jensen - 2008 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29 (1):27-41.
Metaphysical and Moral Status of Cryopreserved Embryos.Jason T. Eberl - 2012 - The Linacre Quarterly 79 (3):304-315.
Should we sacrifice embryos to cure people?Francisco Lara - 2012 - Human Affairs 22 (4):623-635.
Editorial Note.Rebecca Kukla - 2014 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 24 (4):vii-ix.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-12-31

Downloads
31 (#702,326)

6 months
9 (#419,313)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?