Wittgenstein's critique of referential theories of meaning and the paradox of ostension: Philosophical Investigations §§26-48

In David K. Levy & Edoardo Zamuner (eds.), Wittgenstein’s Enduring Arguments. Routledge (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Saul Wittgenstein's skeptical paradox.Ronald Suter - 1986 - Philosophical Research Archives 12:183-193.
Referential inscrutability: Coming to terms without it.John R. Welch - 1984 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 22 (2):263-273.
Wherefore the Failure of Private Ostension?George Wrisley - 2011 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89 (3):483 - 498.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
1 (#1,889,095)

6 months
1 (#1,516,429)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David G. Stern
University of Iowa

Citations of this work

On Not Defining Sustainability.Jeffry L. Ramsey - 2015 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 28 (6):1075-1087.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references