Taking Semantics and Embodiment into Account

Constructivist Foundations 9 (1):139-141 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Open peer commentary on the article “A Cybernetic Computational Model for Learning and Skill Acquisition” by Bernard Scott & Abhinav Bansal. Upshot: The Computational Theory of Mind suffers from an inherent weakness owing to its difficulty in taking semantics and embodiment properly into account. It is suggested that these difficulties could be alleviated if it were recognized that the fact that the model presented here employs a computer as a tool, to highlight certain key features of its dynamics, does not necessarily involve assuming that the underlying processes that are modelled are themselves strictly computational in nature

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,122

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Quality and Qualifications.G. Zeeuw - 2013 - Constructivist Foundations 9 (1):138-139.
Goal-directed Action and Eligible Forms of Embodiment.D. Vernon - 2013 - Constructivist Foundations 9 (1):85-85.
The Meaning of Embodiment.Julian Kiverstein - 2012 - Topics in Cognitive Science 4 (4):740-758.
Representation and inference for natural language: a first course in computational semantics.Patrick Blackburn - 2005 - Stanford, Calif.: Center for the Study of Language and Information. Edited by Johannes Bos.
Davidson's Semantics and Computational Understanding of Language.Damjan Bojadžiev - 1989 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 36 (1):133-139.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-17

Downloads
11 (#1,045,260)

6 months
1 (#1,346,405)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references