Metaphilosophy 38 (1):23–43 (2007)

Authors
Todd Stewart
Illinois State University
Abstract
What is the point of developing an epistemology for a topic—for example, morality? When is it appropriate to develop the epistemology of a topic? For many topics—for example, the topic of socks—we see no need to develop a special epistemology. Under what conditions, then, does a topic deserve its own epistemology? I seek to answer these questions in this article. I provide a criterion for deciding when we are warranted in developing an epistemological theory for a topic. I briefly apply this criterion to moral epistemology and argue that some approaches to moral epistemology should be abandoned. I also argue that we can develop an epistemology for a topic without committing ourselves to a specific substantive theory of justification, such as reliabilism or coherentism, if we work within a suitably neutral framework.
Keywords topical epistemology  epistemology  moral epistemology  epistemology of mathematics
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9973.2006.00472.x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,379
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Knowledge and its Limits.Timothy Williamson - 2000 - Oxford University Press.
The Structure of Empirical Knowledge.Laurence BonJour - 1985 - Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard University Press.
Epistemology and Cognition.Alvin Ira Goldman - 1986 - Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard University Press.
The Scientific Image.C. Van Fraassen Bas - 1980 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

View all 29 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Predicament of Moral Epistemology.Sushruth Ravish - 2019 - Journal of the Indian Council of Philosophical Research 36 (2):265-279.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Epistemology and the Wikipedia.P. D. Magnus - 2006 - North American Computing and Philosophy Conference.
The Epistemological Status of a Naturalized Epistemology.Ron Amundson - 1983 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 26 (3):333 – 344.
Recent Work on Epistemic Value.Duncan Pritchard - 2007 - American Philosophical Quarterly 44 (2):85 - 110.
The Two Epistemologies of Ernst von Glasersfeld.K. H. Müller - 2011 - Constructivist Foundations 6 (2):220-226.
Systems-Oriented Social Epistemology.Alvin Goldman - 2010 - Oxford Studies in Epistemology 3:189-214.
How (Not) to Specify Normal Conditions for Response-Dependent Concepts.Jussi Haukioja - 2007 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 85 (2):325 – 331.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
54 ( #212,118 of 2,519,690 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #406,314 of 2,519,690 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes