- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Should Religion Shape Science?
Faith and Philosophy 21 (3):334-352 (2004)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Seeing Shape: Shape Appearances and Shape Constancy.David J. Bennett - 2012 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 63 (3):487-518.
Mikael Stenmark, rationality in science, religion and everyday life: A critical evaluation of four models of rationality. [REVIEW]Michael H. Barnes - 1997 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 42 (3):190-192.
Book review: Mikael Stenmark. How to relate science and religion a multidimensional model. Grand rapids: William B. eerdmans publishing company, 2004, XX + 287 pages, $28.00. [REVIEW]Edward L. Schoen - 2005 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 58 (1):55-58.
Rationality in Science, Religion and Everyday Life.Mikael Stenmark - 1995 - University of Notre Dame Press.
An Unfinished Debate: What Are the Aims of Religion and Science?Mikael Stenmark - 1997 - Zygon 32 (4):491-514.
How to relate science and religion: A multidimensional model. By Mikael Stenmark.Jan Marten Ivo Klaver - 2008 - Heythrop Journal 49 (4):706–707.
Beyond conflict and reduction: between philosophy, science, and religion.William Desmond, John Steffen & Koen Decoster (eds.) - 2001 - Leuven, Belgium: Leuven University Press.
The perception of shape.David H. Sanford - 1983 - In Carl Ginet & Sydney Shoemaker (eds.), Knowledge And Mind: Phil Essays. Oxford University Press.
Dancing to Diversity: Science-Religion Dialogue in India.Kuruvila Pandikattu (ed.) - 2008 - Serials Publications.
Scientific theory and religion.Ernest William Barnes - 1933 - Cambridge [Eng.],: The University press.
Analytics
Added to PP
2011-01-09
Downloads
194 (#98,212)
6 months
3 (#880,460)
2011-01-09
Downloads
194 (#98,212)
6 months
3 (#880,460)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Naturalistic methodology in an emerging scientific psychology: Lotze and fechner in the balance.Patrick McDonald - 2008 - Zygon 43 (3):605-625.
References found in this work
Moral Philosophy as Applied Science.Michael Ruse & Edward O. Wilson - 1986 - Philosophy 61 (236):173-192.
When Faith and Reason Clash: Evolution and the Bible.Alvin Plantinga - 1991 - Christian Scholar's Review 21 (1):8-32.
Methodological Naturalism.Alvin Plantinga - 1996 - In Jitse M. van der Meer (ed.), Facets of Faith and Science, Volume I: Historiography and Modes of Interaction.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6d9b7f7c4c-tstkh uwo